When it comes to blockbuster directors, few do better than James Cameron. His films have grossed over his $6 billion at the box office worldwide.
In addition to hits like “Terminator 2: Judgment Day” and “Alien,” Cameron’s filmography also includes “Titanic.” It was the highest-grossing film of all time for years until 2009’s Avatar broke his own record. It has generated $2.91 billion in revenue to date.
Both of his biggest films were massive undertakings, drawing large crowds of moviegoers due to the size and spectacle of what was on display. However, his next film, Avatar: Path of Water, required him to move his entire life to New Zealand due to the painstaking process of creating his sequel.
The past few years have been full of hard work, and that’s part of why Cameron wanted to do it.
“I’m drawn to difficult things. Difficult things are attractive to me,” said the director Recent GQ Cover Stories while promoting the next “Avatar” installment.
From diving to the bottom of the ocean to film the wreckage of the Titanic, to developing new technology to bring Pandora to life in Avatar, Cameron has a reputation for pushing the boundaries of filmmaking.
“I think it probably goes back to the idea that there are a lot of smart, really talented, really talented filmmakers out there who can’t do the hard stuff,” Cameron said. It gives me the tactical edge to do the dumb stuff, because really talented people don’t want to do it.”
Along with the difficulties in producing his film, it requires a huge budget. The production budget for the first “Avatar” was about $250 million. Cameron said that for the second movie to be profitable, “it has to be the third highest grossing movie of all time or his fourth highest grossing movie. That’s your threshold. That’s your It is the break-even point of .”
Cameron was known as a big-budget director, saying he “used to be really defensive” about the cost of his films, but the 68-year-old is willing to accept high production costs as a worthwhile investment. became.
“If I can make a business case for spending a billion dollars on a movie, I’ll do it. You want to know why? Because we don’t just pile everything up and set it on fire.” “We give it to the people,” he said. “If the studio agrees and thinks it’s a good investment, why not do it as opposed to buying an oil lease in the north of Scotland that someone else thinks is a good investment?”
Want to earn more and work less? register For free CNBC Make It: Your Money Virtual Event On December 13th at 12:00 PM ET, learn how to increase your earning power from the Money Guru.